Language selection


What We Heard

Feedback from Stakeholders on the CORE’s Draft Risk Assessment for Non-Review Country Visits

The Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (CORE) thanks you for taking the time to review our draft Risk Assessment Process for Non-Review Country Visits and provide us with constructive feedback. The purpose of this document is to provide a summary of the main comments received from the public, private and plural stakeholders that the CORE consulted. The insights and opinions shared with us (and highlighted herein) are much appreciated and highly valued. 

Risk Assessment for Non-Review Country Visits

The risk assessment process that the Office of the CORE will follow when planning, implementing and following up visits to countries where communities or individuals may be affected by the operations of Canadian companiesFootnote1 working in the garment, mining and/or oil and gas sectors. This risk assessment process will be used by the CORE to inform both in-person and virtual non-review country visits, i.e. visits to countries not subject to a complaint received through the CORE’s Human Rights Responsibility Mechanism (HRRM) or a CORE-initiated study. 

Who we consulted

The CORE consulted a targeted number of key stakeholders as part of this consultation process. Those consulted include public, private and plural stakeholders, and represented all three of the sectors within the CORE’s mandate: garment, mining and oil/gas. Of the ten stakeholders consulted, eight provided feedback. 

What we heard

The feedback provided on the draft document largely fell into the following categories:

Purpose of non-review country visits

In compiling feedback, it became evident that the draft document did not provide sufficient clarity regarding the purpose of a non-review country visit. The revised document now clarifies that non-review country visits may serve several purposes including:

Title of the document

We received feedback suggesting that the title of the document be shortened and amended to emphasize not only risk assessment but also the management of risks identified. We have amended the title to the following: ‘Risk Management Process for Non-Review Country Visits’.

Country selection criteria

Stakeholders asked for greater clarity regarding what criteria will be used to select countries for a non-review country visit. The revised document now includes the following criteria for country selection:


Most stakeholders also asked for greater detail on which Canadian and local actors would be consulted prior to implementing a non-review-country visit. Some felt Canadian embassies, government departments, the OECD National Contact Point, Canadian civil society organizations and coalitions, as well as Canadian companies operating in the country should be given greater attention in the planning and implementation phases of such a visit. Stakeholders recommended that the CORE brief the Canadian Ambassador at the conclusion of a visit, which was always the CORE’s intention and is now explicitly referenced in the document.

Report a problem on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, please contact us.

Date Modified: